-
February 15th, 2009GeneralWelcome to the Abdominal Imaging Section of Radiology Daily.
In the Abdominal Imaging section, we will be keeping you up to date on the latest information in the field of Abdominal Imaging, including abdominal ultrasound, colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, use of multiplanar reformations (MPRs) for abdomen and pelvis, MDCT, helical (single and multidetector-row) CT and MRI, CT/MR angiography, and CT cholangiography.
We will also include news on the current clinical challenges in abdominal imaging, including interpreting imaging studies, and how to choose and use the various imaging technologies in the hope of better patient outcomes.
[text_ad]
Tags: abdominal, abdominal imagin, Abdominal Imaging, abdominal ultrasound, angiography, cholangiography, colonoscopy, CT, ct and mri, CT/MR angiography, imaging, MDCT, MI, MR, MR angiography, mri, rad, radiology, Radiology Daily, scanning, TTE, ultrasound, virtual colonoscopy -
April 21st, 2008GeneralThe objective of a recent study was to determine whether a new method of ultrasound assessment of stool retention could be used as a method of identifying children with functional chronic constipation.
The prospective study has concluded that ultrasound assessment of stool retention in children with functional chronic constipation has a high correlation with proctoscopic examination and colonic transit time.
Methodology
120 children with a diagnosis of constipation based on patient history and physical examination were recruited for this study. Chronic disease was defined as symptoms that had persisted for >6 months. The control group was comprised of 105 children with a normal defecation pattern who were diagnosed and treated for various symptoms.Children with diagnosed constipation were examined first by ultrasound, followed by digital rectal examination, enema, proctoscopy, and ultrasound again. Ultrasound was used to measure the transverse diameter of the rectal ampulla and to measure the pelvic width (performed externally using a measuring tape). Pelvic width was defined as the distance between the external margins of the anterior superior iliac spines.
The recto pelvic ratio was determined by calculating the ratio between the transverse diameter of the rectal ampulla and the transverse diameter of the pelvis.
Other features assessed by ultrasound were rectal ampulla width, rectal ampulla filling, bowel filling at splenic flexure, and transverse colon filling.
Children who were diagnosed with megarectum, enlarged colon, and fecal impaction were referred for proctoscopy and measurement of colonic transit time.
[text_ad]
Results of the Study
Compared to controls, children with constipation experienced fecal impaction and overfilling of the splenic flexure significantly more often. The mean recto pelvic ratios were statistically significantly higher in the children diagnosed with chronic constipation than in the controls.The greatest discrepancy was for children aged < =3 years who had an average recto pelvic ratio of 0.24, with the control group averaging 0.17. Those between 3 and 6 years of age also had markedly increased recto pelvic ratios compared to controls (0.23 versus 0.16). Children with an overfilled transverse colon as seen on ultrasound had a significantly longer mean segmental transit time.
Overall, the sensitivity of the ultrasound method in the diagnosis of fecal impaction, as compared to proctoscopy, was 88.3%.
Conclusions
This new method for diagnosis of stool retention and megarectum by ultrasound yielded an adequate sensitivity when using proctoscopy as the standard. The recto pelvic ratio allows diagnosis of megarectum in children with functional chronic constipation, with a cut-off value of 0.189.Reviewer’s Comments
The authors present a novel ultrasound approach to assessing the child diagnosed with chronic constipation. By using the ratio of the rectal ampulla transverse diameter to the transverse diameter of the pelvis, a useful ratio was created that normalized the results.It remains to be determined which children would benefit from this technique, although I would assume that follow-up examinations to evaluate for patient response to treatment might be one use.
Author: Basil Hubbi, MD
Reference
Bijos A, Czerwionka-Szaflarska M, et al. The Usefulness of Ultrasound Examination of the Bowel as a Method of Assessment of Functional Chronic Constipation in Children. Pediatr Radiol; 2007; 37 (December): 1247-1252:[text_ad]
Tags: Chronic constipation, ultrasound -
March 4th, 2008GeneralThe objective of a recent study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of routine ultrasound with that of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to depict solid organ injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma using contrast-enhanced CT scanning as a Reference standard.
The study has concluded that as a noninvasive modality, contrast-enhanced ultrasound approaches contrast-enhanced CT in diagnostic performance in depicting solid organ injuries in children.
Methodology
Over a three-year period, 27 hemodynamically stable patients with moderate or severe injuries were initially evaluated with routine ultrasound and subsequently by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CT. Each of the three imaging techniques was performed by three respective individuals, who later interpreted the results while blinded to the results of the other examinations.Routine ultrasound was performed to detect free fluid, consisting of prolonged scanning in all four quadrants with concentrations in the epigastrium, pericardial space, and right and left colic gutters. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed immediately after using a second-generation blood pool contrast agent. The agent was injected as a bolus with a 22-gauge catheter.
The complete contrast-enhanced exam lasted no more than six minutes. Un-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT examinations were performed immediately after ultrasound. Subsequent statistical analysis was employed.
[text_ad]
Results of the Study
44% of the 27 patients had 14 injuries that were demonstrated on contrast-enhanced CT images. Routine ultrasound was positive in 10 patients, rendering routine ultrasound 57.1% sensitive and 86.7% specific.On the other hand, contrast-enhanced ultrasound depicted 13 of 14 lesions, with only a right adrenal gland contusion missed. All 15 patients who had no organ injuries depicted on CT also had normal contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
On contrast-enhanced ultrasound images, organ injuries appeared as strongly hypoechoic areas adjacent to hyperechoic parenchyma. Microbubbles within the lesion indicated active bleeding. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound was calculated to be 92.9% and 100%, respectively.
Reviewer’s Comments
This is a very interesting article showing that, when used in experienced hands, contrast-enhanced ultrasound accuracy approaches contrast-enhanced CT scanning when depicting solid organ injuries in children.The authors do not comment on the importance of excluding other types of injuries, for which ultrasound may not be useful, such as osseous or vascular injuries. In practical terms, it may not be worth performing a contrast-enhanced ultrasound in a child only to delay the inevitable CT, which will most likely be used to complete the injury profile.
Author: Basil Hubbi, MD
Reference
Valentino M, Serra C, et al. Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced US in Children–Initial Experience.
Radiology; 2008; 246 (March): 903-909.[text_ad]
Tags: contrast-enhanced ultrasound, ultrasound
